On a rainy audit day in Hebei, I watched a line extrude a quiet hero of the sealing world: the door frame seal rubber. Not flashy, but when it’s wrong you hear wind whistle, see heat leak, and feel the bill for wasted energy. When it’s right, silence. Comfort. Compliance. And margins that don’t evaporate.
Demand for door frame seal rubber is moving on two rails: EV/automotive NVH upgrades and building retrofits for energy efficiency. Ozone-resistant EPDM still dominates, but I’m seeing more NBR+PVC for oil exposure and hybrid recipes (EPDM+FIBER+EPDM) to stabilize compression set in hot climates. Compliance-wise, EN 12365 for windows/doors and the usual ASTM D2000/SAE J200 for elastomer classification lead the spec sheets.
Origin: Room 1410, No. 119 Zhongxing East Street, Xiangdu District, Xingtai City, Hebei Province, China. Materials on tap include NBR, EPDM, CR, FKM/ECO blends, and all foam rubber variants. Honestly, it’s a broad menu—good for matching real-world environments rather than forcing a one-compound-fits-all gamble.
| Spec (SD-001) | Typical value (≈) |
|---|---|
| Material family | EPDM/NBR/CR; FKM/ECO blends; solid or foam |
| Hardness | 55–75 Shore A (solid); 10–25 Shore 00 (foam) |
| Temp range | -40 to +120°C (EPDM), up to 150°C (FKM/ECO) |
| Compression set | ≤25% @70°C/22h (ASTM D395, typical) |
| Ozone/UV | No cracks @50 pphm, 40°C, 72h (EPDM) |
| Flame rating (option) | UL 94 V-0 or FMVSS 302 (on request) |
| Profiles | U, P, D, bulb, lip, co-extruded carrier |
| Color/finish | Black matte standard; custom on request |
Many customers say the switch to foam/solid co-extrusions cut cabin noise by a “noticeable notch,” which, yes, is unscientific—but you hear it.
Service life: around 8–15 years in typical UV/ozone exposure; real-world use may vary with heat soak and door slam counts, obviously.
| Supplier | Certs/Standards | MOQ/Lead | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shuoding (Hebei) | ASTM D2000, EN 12365, ISO 9001/IATF 16949 (typical), RoHS/REACH | ≈3–4 weeks; tooling ≈10–15 days | Broad compounds; co-extrusion; consistent foam cells |
| Regional Vendor B | ASTM D2000; basic RoHS | ≈5–6 weeks | Lower tooling cost; fewer flame-retardant options |
| Low-cost Vendor C | Limited declarations | Variable | Watch compression set and adhesive peel strength |
Customer notes: “Slam effort dropped ~12% after switching to dual-durometer,” one OEM told me. Another said water ingress claims fell below 0.3% in rainy regions—small number, big savings.
Compliance and documentation available on request: ISO 9001/IATF 16949, RoHS/REACH, UL 94 options. To be honest, the paperwork matters as much as the polymer these days.